FORGIVENESS/ACCEPTANCE

(A Precursor to ENTANGLED)

I like words. When I was a boy, maybe 10 yo or so, my mom picked up this huge dictionary. I mean, it was heavy and required its own table to set on. I recall flipping through all the pages in wonder of the number of words I was going to have to learn. Of course, I didn’t. But I was enchanted by this book. And later when I started writing (age 13 yo) I began to think about words, dictionaries; just imagine what I felt like when I discovered a thesaurus. The birth of a dork.

Eventually I began to understand not only that most of my friends, at that age primarily guys, were not as interested in words. But I evolved in my wonder of this new world of words and started using words with an aim to be precise. Or at least I aspired to that end. So when I write now as an experienced, but still a student of the craft of writing, I am a little picky about vocabulary and precision of choosing words with hopefully a little more skill. This is especially true and a challenge in the writing of Entangled .

I was invited into Janis’s therapy at some point because she was missing a lot of the nuances, and recall of her history. So I continued with this therapist after Janis was placed. It started out as an assist with grief, but has now become as much about my understanding of what we went through together as a result of her abusive history, and major mental health issues due to this history, as my grief. Therapy turns out to be a self-exploration and analysis of how this marriage survived. And a new, or renewed, respect for what Janis went through all the years of her life. The therapist told me grief is not a feeling. Huh? Another word to clarify. Or a zen koan?

I avoid absolutes, in general. I look around me and see that extremes nearly always create harmful outcomes. In general. Life has extremes, naturally, but life for the most part runs somewhere down the middle. A lot of compromise goes a long ways toward peace. World peace or just peace between people. The theme of any relationship can be viewed this way. Nations or couples. Friendship or enemies.

Forgiveness or acceptance?

I’m mostly referring here to child victims and the adults they become. Forgiveness is a loaded word. Ask what forgiveness means, and a plethora (I like that word) of scenarios floods my mind. Most of which are firmly entrenched in our cultural and religious traditions. I have no problem with that except when we are trapped with a definition for a problem that does not work. I’m not prone to the idea of free will; like forgiveness, I think there are complex definitions of this idea; biological, genetic and epigenetic, neurological, religious definitions…I find myself stuck.

The word forgiveness is fraught with emotion making it difficult for people to work through when they have been wronged. In my work I found myself struggling with how a child understands that word. Or how his parents understand (i.e. stand-under, or support) an offender who has harmed their child in ways that sometimes are so pernicious and far reaching, that it seems unforgivable, Are we really supposed to forgive? See, I’m stuck. And that’s what this is all about in the book, Entangled. Not if we can forgive, but, can we accept. Do we punish the victim–the child? Of course not. And the perpetrator? Forgive? Tell me what that word means. Who is required to bear responsibility, accountability? What’s the difference between these terms? What happens to the victim as they become adults? Do we then hold them responsible by expecting them to forgive. Or do we choose to look at our own behavior and consider the options we have for this child/adult victim that we love?

I’m responsible for how I respond. That’s it. We are what we have done. We are what we do. That’s as far as I’ve gotten so far in challenging myself to look at the victim who is experiencing life awash with emotion, and instead of responding to the matter with anger, shame, disdain, or passivity, or some other cheap response that exposes its own extreme degrees of outcome, I get to accept responsibility for how I respond. Not expecting or holding the victim responsible for their offender’s assault on them, by asking them to forgive. In the case of assault to a child, we now know the neurological impact on the child’s brain and development. Accept or reject. Not necessarily forgiveness–whatever that really means. What we wish for these adult victims is to ‘move on’, forgive and let go. Because their condition is hurting us, and we want it to stop. We want them to be happy and have a good life, so that we can move on. Have a life. It’s this selfish desire to have things be the way we want them to be that creates this distress for us. Sadly, many of these survivors of abuse are suffering neurological consequences that make them unable to live the life we would hope for them. So what are we left with if we commit to them? What is our responsibility in these circumstances? Understanding all is to forgive all? Discount the victim for not getting over it? (Just snap out of it?)

I can take responsibility for how I respond to the victim–their condition. Accept them–just as they are. To offer unconditional love. Caritas, that term that describes the deep compassion for the other person’s plight, their condition in life. Is the victim responsible for their condition, do we expect them to take responsibility? Or, can we hold them accountable for their behaviors instead. Forgiveness implies the victim’s responsibility for their circumstances; acceptance expresses understanding, but expecting them to be accountable for what they do, not who they are. A word: Love. Overused, vague: We love our cat, we love our cell phone, we love mac and cheese, pizza, beer, sunrises, sunsets, our four-wheeler, our car, our coffee. But I’ll be damned if I can come up with a better word for how I love my children, my grandchildren, my life–my wife. The word Love seems to cover that just fine.

Compassion is not all warm and fuzzy. In fact, in the words of Pema Chodron, it’s actually raw. It challenges us to change. The challenge for us is to remain compassionate.